The subjugation of the English people is almost complete. CCTV cameras are everywhere, whether they are operated by private companies such as shops, shopping centres, local authority street cameras or mobile ones that are operated by the police. London itself is the most spied upon city in the world, even one place ahead in the rankings above Bejing in China. See: The Most Spied Upon Cities in the World As far as the United Kingdom as a whole is concerned 20% of the world's CCTV cameras are to be found in this country and yet the United Kingdom is only the 21st most populated country in the world, taking up a mere 0.87% of the global population.
Earlier this year there was a controversial case of the police stopping a man who refused to show his face to a mobile police recording camera. After stopping him the man continued to refuse to have his face filmed and he was consequently issued with a £90 fine for allegedly 'swearing' although the last time I checked there was no law on the statute book that outlawed swearing and I dare say he only swore when he had been unjustly stopped to begin with! This appears to have been an incident entirely initiated and provoked by the police. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of that particular case we have seen in recent years a tendency by the police to view ordinary members of the public as 'guilty' until proven innocent and an even more worrying tendency for certain forces to make up their own laws on the hoof!
An example of the police creating de facto as opposed to de jure laws is Nottingham Police in 2016 taking it upon themselves to classify wolf whistling as a 'hate crime'. Behind all of this is of course a group of feminists. Police forces have a statutory duty to uphold the law and apart from common law, law is made by Parliament, not by the police!
The now leader of the Liberal Democrat Party (a feminist with a shrill voice) is one of those politicians campaigning for 'misogyny' to become a 'hate crime'. You will note however that these feminists have little to say about misandry which is far more common. One only has to think of the stereotype of the 'nagging wife' to realise that there is some truth in what I say. Likewise a man is more likely to be a victim of 'domestic violence' than a woman and yet very little is said about this. For many years now I have been saying on my blogs that Aryan man must grow balls and take back mastery over his own hearth and bugger political correctness!
Returning to the issue of CCTVs and their ubiquitous presence, one only has to recall the novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, originally published in 1949 but completed in 1948. In his work we have the infamous telescreen which operated both as a television and a security camera. A couple of years ago it was revealed that 'smart' televisions had the capacity to spy on you and indeed so does your laptop computer which is why I suggest that people disable the camera and microphone functions when they are not needed. Like the telescreen modern television is full of propaganda, whether this be overt such as the 'news' or more covert such as the social conditioning that we find not only in mindless soap operas for adults but BBC children's programmes. The CBBC channel is rife with this with bedtime stories telling toddlers that some families have two 'mothers' or two 'fathers'.
With the introduction of the Crime and Disorder Act in 1998 for the first time in England, Scotland and Wales judges had the power to imposer longer prison sentences and larger fines if it could be established in court that an offence was motivated by 'hate' of the victim's race or religious affiliation. This went one step further than sections 3 and 3A of the Public Order Act of 1986 which outlawed for the first time 'hate speech'. Now we have the criminalisation of thought and THIS is Orwellian. We have moved from the criminalisation of an act to the criminalisation of words to the criminalisation of the thought. This was predicted by Orwell in his novel and the term that he coined for this was crimethink, although those who have not actually read the book refer to this as thoughtcrime. The terms crimethink and wrongthink are the ones actually used in the society portrayed in the novel.
Many years ago when I went through a phase of reading some of David Icke's earlier books I encountered Icke's use of the term 'internal policeman'. He talked about his theory that people do not always need the actual police to police their actions, words or thoughts for we do this ourselves. Social engineering and social conditioning have created one vast prison, a prison without bars in which we are as individuals so terrified of having unorthodox thoughts that we act as our own internal or psychological policeman and monitor and control our own thoughts lest we say or do something which would be frowned upon by society as a whole. The State no longer merely outlaws the act but our inconvenient and rebellious words and now our thoughts, with judges punishing us for having unorthodox thoughts. Crimethink has now become a reality and is on the statute book.
The organisation in Orwell's novel that enforced laws concerning crimethink were of course the Thought Police or to use the more correct term which appears in the novel, Thinkpol, and they used the surveillance systems of the day, not so much as to catch real criminals but to look for any deviation in behaviour or appearance from the masses. This is the main purpose of CCTV in the United Kingdom today. It is largely impotent in detecting or preventing crime. Instead it is a system that is being used (along with the Internet and 'smart' phones) to amass data on the whole population. The prime mover in this are the 'intelligence' (unfortunate use of the term-it reminds me of that other oxymoron 'military intelligence') agencies, in particular GCHQ whose main task is to not just monitor foreign and hostile 'enemy' communications but to spy on the general populace, something which they have been doing illegally for decades and yet no one has been taken to court over this. The courts are there merely to punish the masses who do not conform to the expectations of the (largely invisible) elite. Their love of fining people is an excellent way to raise funds for the Treasury instead of compensating the victim. As an aside when Woden's Folk appeared in most mainstream news outlets the other week this new blog of mine experienced a spike in visits as did those of my folk comrades. I am well aware that GCHQ and/or MI5 visit our blogs for their presence is detectable in the corresponding spike in Linux users in my blog statistics, an operating system which is used by less than 2% of the population but is standard for GCHQ! I do hope that their visits were not a complete waste of time and that they did learn something about Indo-European mythology!
Like the modern day police and 'intelligence' agencies Thinkpol orchestrate false flag operations and as part of this they infiltrate what they regard as 'subversive' organisations and influence others to commit offences. Usually the most suspect ones are the 'fanatics' who have very little if any prior history that can be checked. Undercover reporters who earn their living from lying to others and duplicity are often used by the authorities for purposes of infiltration and subversion and I have no doubt that they share information with them either willingly or under duress.
Returning to David Icke's theory of the internal policeman this in essence is the same thing as the Orwellian concept of doublethink, the ability to hold two contradictory opinions at the same time. This is essentially cognitive dissonance and ultimately it can result in only one thing-psychosis. This may help in part to explain the sharp rise in mental illness in recent decades. People en masse these days engage in doublethink without necessarily always being aware of it. With this kind of mass sociological and psychological control one can see why the government does not need to spend greater sums of money on expanding the 'intelligence' services.
The official term for the language of Oceania, the fictional superstate in which the novel is set is newspeak, an artificial language deliberately constructed in order to control the thoughts, words and ultimately the actions of the masses. It is no secret that this is the very same aim of political correctness which made its public appearance in the west in the 1970s and has gained a firm foothold since then. This ideology, initially promoted by Marxists is now mainstream and has infected every aspect of our lives. It effectively legitimises homosexuality, same-sex 'marriage', miscegenation, feminism and any other act or movement that harms Aryan society. Any prevailing lunatic theory gaining currency such as 'gender dysphoria' and people being allowed to 'choose' a gender is not only legitimised by the State and its institutions but those who oppose it are treated as social lepers or even criminalised. Even once rational people who like myself are old enough to remember a slightly saner world are infected by this neurosis and neurosis is exactly what political correctness is.
Newspeak is not only an artificial language created by the State but the size of its vocabulary shrinks every year, giving people less options for the words that they can use. This effectively limits freedom of thought as well. As with political correctness and Icke's internal policeman newspeak starts off with controlling our words and then our thoughts with the ultimate aim of discouraging unorthodoxy and rebellion against the State. This is why the laws introduced since the mid 1980s should cause us to speak out against this encroaching totalitarianism.
Propaganda was a central feature of how the party of the State, Ingsoc (English Socialism) operated. The primary means of disseminating propaganda (or lies) was via the telescreen and the press. We see the same methods used today by the State. Where the State does not own or control the media (e.g. the BBC) it works in cahoots with rootless millionaire media owners who likewise have a personal vested interest in preserving the lie so the same crap is turned out regardless of who owns a particular 'news' paper, television or radio company. The same type of people are recruited for these positions who have undergone the same type of education (brainwashing) in the cultural Marxist universities of the day and like paid whores will follow the 'party line' and not deviate from what they are told to write or speak. There is very little real journalism to speak of these days. More often than not a 'journalist' to save time, energy and work will simply copy and paste what they read on the Internet without any critical examination or any genuine right of reply when someone has been defamed by these creatures with their lies and slurs.
What is the purpose of all this brainwashing? To what end are we being manipulated? One of the aims is to create a compliant population, a compliant workforce, a nation of slaves. This process in England was initiated by William the Bastard and the Norman invasion and conquest of 1066 where most of our native nobles were deposed (apart from the traitors) and century after century of social conditioning has occurred since then. The extension of basic education and literacy to the masses was for two reasons and neither were altruistic. The first reason was that the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century required a greater number of skilled people and educated people who could function in administrative positions. Secondly with the emergence of 'news' papers in the 17th century the elite of the day realised that mass propaganda could very quickly be disseminated to the population as a whole but that this was contingent on mass education as well and this started to develop in the mid 19th century. My great great great grandfather was originally a schoolmaster in the 1830s and 40s prior to becoming a minister of religion. Being born in the 18th century he could only have received an education if his father, a Gentleman, paid for it. The vast majority of people at the time had little if no literacy and this no longer suited the economic system of the time or the elite. With the gradual extension of the electoral franchise in the 19th century there had to be a means of influencing the masses politically. This of course was the role of the press and eventually in the 20th century the radio and then television. For this reason the Internet is seen as a threat to the State for it has no regulatory control over it. Consequently many police forces will spend thousands of pounds in Council Tax payers' money 'policing' the Internet, searching for 'subversives'! Likewise GCHQ and MI5 will have teams of people engaged in checking what people like me write on our blogs and websites.
We have seen this week the publication of a report by The Centre for Social Justice (another oxymoron) titled Ageing Confidently-Supporting an ageing workforce. This piece of propaganda from an organisation which is chaired by that famous social justice warrior, Iain Duncan Smith (the Secretary of State who introduced the now infamous Universal Credit) and proposes (surprise, surprise) that the State pension retirement age should be increased first to 70 in 2028 and then 75 in 2035. This in effect would turn the entire country into a workhouse, a slave population where only a minority of people such as Duncan Smith could afford to retire whenever they wanted and I can guarantee that the likes of him will not be flogging their guts out on a building site at the age of 74! Any political party which attempts to support and adopt this insane and inhumane policy will be severely punished at the next general election and the Conservative Party effectively is supported by people who have already retired or are close to it. As the Americans say "do the mathematics"!
For a number of years now we keep hearing the mantra that 'we are all living longer' which in itself of course is a lie for we are not "all" living longer. As I have commented on other blogs before now, people are not living any longer than they ever used to do-they are simply not dying in infancy any more. This has extended the average life span but NOT the life expectancy which are two separate issues. Anyone like myself who has spent several years in ancestral research can tell you that nothing has changed in terms of life spans apart from the near eradication of infant mortality. We are being sold a lie and many are foolish enough to believe it. There may be more old and older people alive now but that is due to the spike in births after the war and extending to the early 1960s and the consequent reduction of births since then with the introduction of contraception and legalised child murder. Once these 'baby boomers' start to die off as we will, the population will begin to stabalise. In terms of 'affordability' of pensions if the HMRC were to pull their finger out and chase millionaires and large corporations for the tax that is owed to the Treasury instead of agreeing cosy deals behind closed doors then this recovered tax would more than offset the cost of old age pensions. However the Conservative government prefers instead to offer tax cuts to its rich financial backers than look after its elderly. The recent fiasco over the withdrawal of free television licences for the over 75s is indicative of that. Regardless of whether people are 'living longer' or not they are certainly not getting any healthier as the BBC keeps telling us about the burden that the elderly place upon the NHS! So there is a clear contradiction (cognitive dissonance) and a flaw in the arguments of these social justice warriors such as Duncan Smith. Likewise we are continually bombarded with propaganda that people actually want to work themselves to death. Everything you see is by popular demand!
I really do urge my readers to obtain a copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four and to analyse it in depth for this is the blueprint of modern western government.
No comments:
Post a Comment